Curse

asd334 · Sep 12, 2005, 05:19 AM // 05:19

thats a fake i know the artist of that drawing

SOT · Sep 12, 2005, 06:44 AM // 06:44

Quote:

Originally Posted by UberRusty

Yeah, too bad all that other shit owns Starcraft Online. I am willing to bet $100 on that if Starcraft 2 was released, it wouldn't be anywhere near the popularity of Starcraft 1. End of transmission.

Curiously, Starcraft 2 was mentioned from the recesses of your own ass, not my post. I said Starcraft Online, which by logical inferrance I meant a game like WOW but from the Starcraft Mythology and gaming convention.

Starcraft 2 would be warcraft III in space at this point. Diablo III would be Diablo II with more system requirements. This would be gay, totally, purely, gay.

Next!

MCS · Sep 12, 2005, 07:27 AM // 07:27

Quote:

Starcraft 2 would be warcraft III in space at this point. Diablo III would be Diablo II with more system requirements. This would be gay, totally, purely, gay.

Thats like saying Diablo 2 is Diablo 1 with higher system requirments. Thats just not true.

SOT · Sep 12, 2005, 08:08 AM // 08:08

Quote:

Originally Posted by MCS

Thats like saying Diablo 2 is Diablo 1 with higher system requirments. Thats just not true.

Okay, so I forgot to mention that colored text on items is more seeable. The plot takes 9 times as much time to finalize. You can play over battlenet and use hardcore characters named celerymaiden99. You have more of the same 40 or so monsters that are different from species standpoint only in the color pallete used. You have an expansion pack with a druid class and an assassin class. You get to kill more monsters than exist in any army ever fantasized about, several dozen times while earning titles that mean nothing. You have the amazingly more detailed cutscenes. You have a thicker, novella sized game manual with deckhard cain's mouthy entreaties in it. You get to see desert cat people and swarms of bugs that somehow can take a sword hit and die as a swarm all at once.

So in essence, the cosmeticals, the storage diff, and the staff of hordradrim, and the plot devices are all more, more, more. So you basically hit the nail on the head.

Oh and diablo was like 3 feet taller and in perfect health after you smeared him in the first game.

Wow, sound like it to me also!

Manderlock · Sep 12, 2005, 03:30 PM // 15:30

Dont forget Uber D, that guy was the superman of all the different diablos.

UberRusty · Sep 12, 2005, 08:20 PM // 20:20

Quote:

Curiously, Starcraft 2 was mentioned from the recesses of your own ass, not my post. I said Starcraft Online, which by logical inferrance I meant a game like WOW but from the Starcraft Mythology and gaming convention.

Starcraft 2 would be warcraft III in space at this point. Diablo III would be Diablo II with more system requirements. This would be gay, totally, purely, gay.

This whole post comes out of the recess of your own ass. Which so happens to contain your brain. You must get a lot of brain farts.

Sir Skullcrasher · Sep 12, 2005, 09:19 PM // 21:19

Why is Blizzard trying to capture the FPS title crown... i mean you can't beat down games like Half Life 1 & 2, Halo 1 & 2, DOOM Series, and many other FPS that established what shooter games should be like. I got a feeling that Starcraft: Ghost will either be cancel or it get release but no one would like it.

And would Blizzard be dumb enough to take another popular series and turn it into a MMORPG (i.e. World of Warcraft) cuz if they make Starcraft 2 into a MMORPG and charge monthly fee.. forget it.. i rather play Guild Wars than spending cash on them

Manderlock · Sep 12, 2005, 09:21 PM // 21:21

Eh, best FPS Ive played has to be Red Dead Revolver

Ultimate_Gaara · Sep 13, 2005, 04:29 AM // 04:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by Enigmatics

What's wrong with Warcraft? Really? Or do you mean WoW.

Well compared to starcraft its just lame...

Manderlock · Sep 13, 2005, 04:31 AM // 04:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ultimate_Gaara

Well compared to starcraft its just lame...

Compaired to AoE they are both just gum stuck on your shoe.

UberRusty · Sep 13, 2005, 03:21 PM // 15:21

Quote:

Eh, best FPS Ive played has to be Red Dead Revolver

It's nothing compared to the likes of Half Life 2 etc.

Quote:

Why is Blizzard trying to capture the FPS title crown...

They're not. They're making Hellgate: London a FUN game to play, not anything special. They're not trying to reinvent the genre.

Manderlock · Sep 13, 2005, 05:47 PM // 17:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by UberRusty

It's nothing compared to the likes of Half Life 2 etc.

They're not. They're making Hellgate: London a FUN game to play, not anything special. They're not trying to reinvent the genre.

Well, thank you for changing my opinion.

Alura Pyro · Sep 13, 2005, 05:50 PM // 17:50

this game is going to scale the difficulty based on the team size and level along with the content never being the same you have a couple of safe places but outside the surface changes every time you leave

UberRusty · Sep 13, 2005, 06:31 PM // 18:31

And from the previews AND trailers, Hellgate: London's random map system (much like the Diablo series), seems to work very well. It's like Serious Sam with better graphics AND weapons. =O Gimme.

Alura Pyro · Sep 13, 2005, 06:32 PM // 18:32

and you dont feel like you have takes a large amount of drugs

Link Ironhammer · Sep 20, 2005, 02:58 AM // 02:58

Never playd Diablo whats it like?

chris_nin00 · Sep 20, 2005, 02:59 AM // 02:59

Quote:

Originally Posted by Link Ironhammer

Never playd Diablo whats it like?

Almost like this...
http://www.fatethegame.com/